10 Comments
User's avatar
Sajith Pai's avatar

Good piece, Anmol and Anshul. Ofc I am biased but still!

Akash Kulgod's avatar

We’re at the start of the BARBIE going after deep-tech as well and often choosing to not go/drop-out of college entirely. Not yet unicorns but give them time. Though I wouldn’t make claims of them doing better than other founders inherently

Praan, Airbound, Aspera, Jhana, and i’ll be self serving and add Dognosis as well ;)

dheeraj's avatar

Thanks for writing

dheeraj's avatar

What about the term marbie!?

Sampurna Baruah's avatar

Good article. Would be interesting to know which of these factors - studying outside or having affluent backgrounds impact the most.

Also do we have any statistic about any such founder from non affluent backgrounds making it big?

Apoorvaa S Raghavan's avatar

this explains so much about why some Indian consumer brands just feel… different. taste really is a competitive advantage.

Ashton Kreesh's avatar

rich kids with Stanford degrees do well, shocking

this is... not exactly a contrarian thesis?

Ishan's avatar

Great read guys

Mahesh Singh's avatar

I was thinking of the point that you did final cover in the second half - is it more the privilege of an affluent family or the foreign education that’s playing a greater role in these young people starting a business and becoming more successful? It would be worthwhile making a comparison of all founders by their family background to see if that adds up. Of course having a foreign stint broadens everyone’s perspective.

nateLandman's avatar

While it's nearly impossible to know the number of Indians that studied abroad and later returned to India, it'd be great to see how many "Barbies" pitched your funds and how many of those were funded.

That baseline (denominator) number, or whatever other proxy you can think of, is the missing piece in this article!

Two technical details: Aadit Palicha grew up mostly in Dubai; Rahul Reddy grew up completely in SoCal.